|
|
| |
The recent skyrocketing popularity of Pabst Blue Ribbon beer was propelled by a group of brand enthusiasts who “hijacked” PBR’s original image and gave it a new spin. In Brand Hijack: Marketing without marketing, marketing consultant Alex Wipperfurth describes this new twist on identity theft and suggests ways to make sure it happens to your brand (Penguin, 2005).
Wipperfurth’s thesis—that brand images should be left in the hands of hijackers—draws heavily on the work of the French academic Bernard Cova. In a seminal paper that appeared in the European Journal of Marketing in 2001, Cova argued that modern consumers have become less interested in the objects of consumption than in the social links and identities associated with those objects. According to Cova, the strains of globalization have re-awakened tribal instincts in all of us, leading us to form tribal communities around selected consumer brands.
Members of Cova’s brand tribes cannot be easily reached by traditional mass marketing. First, unlike traditional tribes, modern brand tribes do not occupy fixed physical space. Second, modern tribal associations are in a constant state of flux, with members free to belong to as many tribes as they like. As a result, the tribes remain largely invisible to those who do not belong to them.
|
|
| |
Disillusioned by the breakdown of civil society and mistrustful of modern advertising, Cova’s tribesfolk are a singular lot. They have little interest in forming close personal relationships with other members of their tribes, preferring instead intentional anonymity and distance. Their intertribal ties derive almost entirely from their attachment to the common brand. Although fellow tribe members may enjoy hanging out with each other, they rarely show much interest in significant personal interaction.
Some years ago, the cultural anthropologist Keith Hart studied a more traditional tribe in Ghana that had been displaced into an urban slum. Members of that tribe were faced with building economic relations from scratch in a world that lacked both orderly state regulation and the structure of their former tribal group. Neither their traditional tribal social order nor the legally sanctioned contractual agreements of civil society provided completely viable economic models.
Although members of Hart’s displaced tribe had the option of forming relationships based on friendship and trust, these relationships inevitably turned out to be trial-and-error affairs, with high rates of failure. The relationships were subject to neither the constraints imposed by tribal affiliation nor those imposed by legal contract.
Hart concluded that personal trust (derived from limited evidence) may not be the most efficient basis for economic relationships in transitional societies because agreements based on faith (those based on no or little evidence) or confidence (those based on considerable evidence) are subject to stronger sanctions.
Professor Cova, who currently shares faculty appointments at Euromed Marseille and Bocconi University in Milan, writes by email that he believes modern tribes are also held together by ties that have more to do with shared faith than with trust. Given that faith is essentially irrational, Cova suggests that emotional appeals will be most effective in reaching members of the modern-day tribes. Proof of a product’s efficacy might be expected to become much less of an issue.
|
| |
|
In his book, Wipperfurth raises several interesting issues of his own. Conventional wisdom says that if someone tries to co-opt your brand, you should spare no effort to take it back. But Wipperfurth instead advises brand managers to embrace the brand enthusiast, and then let the brand evolve on its own. He takes Mattel to task for bringing a lawsuit against an artist who exhibited his own unflattering versions of Barbie.
Wipperfurth also raises fundamental questions about brand identity. If your brand is hijacked by a local community that has little visibility among mainstream consumers, there is probably little reason to be concerned. But if your hijackers belong to a highly visible counterculture and your product has traditionally sold to the conservative working class, you might have a problem. In such cases, Wipperfurth recommends that brands develop personas (masks)—as opposed to a consistent brand personality—that can be put on or taken off at will, depending on the target audience.
Crest Whitestrips serves as one of his case studies. Whitestrips was launched before there was much interest in teeth whitening products, and the brand manager at P&G decided to distribute the product over the web before making it available through retail, in hopes of generating word-of-mouth buzz. The company was able to determine from its website traffic that the product had become extremely popular with brides, teenage girls, young Hispanics and gay men, so it heavily targeted those groups with print ads, posters, and postcards. According to Wipperfurth, the approach led to a twelve-fold increase in the size of the teeth-whitening category in less than two years.
Applying Wipperfurth’s formula, however, may not always be so simple. McDonald’s in China provides a case in point. If you visit a large city in China at 3:30 or 4:00 pm, you’ll almost certainly discover school kids at McDonald’s doing their homework. Small apartments lead students to find an alternative place to do their assignments.
Clearly, McDonald’s has a problem. Should it indulge the students or chase them away? Says Bill Chidley, chief creative officer at Design Forum in Dayton, Ohio, “In a world of ‘any traffic is good traffic,’ this student influx should be a blessing. The risks are twofold. First, if the students discourage or displace other profitable segments from visiting McDonald’s, this is obviously bad. And second, if the students build an association with the brand as a place to hang out for this purpose, they may not use the brand in later life stages due to that association.”
Greg Thomas, director of research for the Zyman Institute of Brand Science at Emory University in Atlanta, believes that any disconnect between what a brand intends to convey and what it actually conveys to the consumer places it at risk of assuming a life of its own. In this particular case, he notes that “most businesses—McDonald’s included—are not so long-term oriented that they would provide free study space for 10-plus years simply to obtain future customers.” To McDonald’s great relief, no doubt, the students eventually do go home.
As do customers at Starbucks’ coffee shops. For many, the coffee bars serve as a “third place” between home and office. Although the Starbucks tribe may occasionally convene in this space, none of its members actually lives there. As Wipperfurth notes, "Signe Nordli, the cover girl for Playboy's “Women of Starbucks” issue, ...may drink her daily double, non-fat, venti almond latte, but she'll buy whichever laundry detergent happens to be cheapest at the supermarket."
It would be difficult indeed to imagine a modern brand tribe existing outside the economic infrastructure that supports more formal marketing. And membership in a local brand tribe does not preclude citizenship in the global village. In fact, it may encourage it. The Swiss psychiatrist Carl Jung, for example, argued that integration of the rational and irrational aspects of human experience was essential to the health of the tribal mind.
Given that modern brands originated about 100 years ago as bases for consumer trust, it would be surprising indeed if they were to cease serving that purpose. Consider automobile brands. People who purchase new cars can be reasonably certain that those cars won’t fall apart, and that if they do, they will be repaired under warranty. If any automobile brand were to acquire a reputation for shoddy workmanship, it would be finished.
Meanwhile, brands like BMW and Mercedes continue to market to individual consumers—bypassing brand tribes altogether. For many purchases, the certainty that accompanies blind faith remains a poor substitute for knowing with a high degree of probability that a product is reliable.
[7-Aug-2006]
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
Randall Frost, a freelance writer based in Pleasanton, California, is the author of The Globalization of Trade. His work has appeared in Worth, The New England Financial Journal, CBSHealthWatch and a variety of educational publications.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Jul 31, 2006
|
Building Appeal -- Randall Frost
|
|
|
Part art, part science, the field of branding architecture has never been more relevant to firms around the world.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Mar 13, 2006
|
Standards: Who Needs Them? -- Edwin Colyer
|
|
|
By setting standards, organizations like ISO, EFQM, and Eco-label create a mark of distinction for brands to promote. But rules differ greatly between the groups on who gets to use the mark and how.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Copyright © 2001-2013 brandchannel. All rights reserved.
|
|