linked in facebook twitter rss

  • Interbrand
  • Brandchannel

your chance!
your chance!
 
 
 
 
 

 

  Time Release Branding   Time Release Branding  Edwin Colyer  
         
 
Time Release Branding A drug molecule, whether sitting in a test tube or injected into a patient, should have no personality. It should merely function. Yet under the mastery of marketing wizards, nascent medicines, still far from approval and the open market, start to develop a character of their own.

Their alter ego – the brand – can develop at different stages in the R&D process. Much depends on the company, the product and the market, but drug makers are beginning to realize that every product should have a brand.

 
Now more than ever, pharmaceutical branding has become crucial to creating distinctions in the mind of the patient as well as the physician. This is especially relevant in the US, where drug makers engage in direct-to-consumer advertising – a concept that Europe is only beginning to consider.

"Branding should begin as soon as possible," says Peter Siegel, senior vice-president at Torre Lazur. "We like to get involved early so we are intimate with the product. While a product begins to develop a personality for the researcher, it is its eventual personality in the marketplace that will make it a brand. The sooner we're involved in the branding process the better, because it helps to create a bond with the brand and develop good relationships with the client as well. This journey from a product to a brand is a journey that clients and agencies should take together."

The goals of pharmaceutical branding are subtly different to those of consumer goods manufacturers. With the agreement of the government and healthcare payers, drug makers are free to charge high prices in order to recoup their substantial R&D costs. Branding is, therefore, rarely about adding a premium to a commodity product. Rather, it raises product awareness and boosts sales by projecting values and emotions to healthcare professionals and consumers alike.

The snag, however, is this: by the time a drug reaches the market it may only have a few years of patent protected life left. It can't afford to increase sales gradually through increasing awareness. It doesn't have time to build relationships. It has to launch with a bang.

In other words, all the elements of a pharmaceutical brand should be in place long before the product ever hits the drug store shelves. "Branding should begin as soon as possible," says Siegel. "We like to get involved early so we are intimate with the product. A brand happens anyway – it begins to develop a personality. The people who have created the molecule have a clear idea of what this is. The sooner we're involved the better because it helps to create a bond with the brand and develop good relationships too. When we go from a product to a brand, it's a journey that we take together."

Brand consultants and communications agencies naturally prefer a head start. The reality is often far from this ideal, however. Sometimes the bulk of branding work – from the establishment of brand values and product positioning to the choice of packaging colors – only takes place during Phase III trials.

Not that the drug makers are entirely to blame. Commercial factors can disrupt the best laid plans. The pharmaceutical market is extremely volatile; it only takes the launch of a competitor's product, a change in government policy, or a sudden breakthrough in the R&D labs to cause a drastic change in strategy. Products may have to race through development, with agencies brought in at the last minute.

Most people agree, however, that given the growing importance of branding, the process should generally begin earlier than it does at present.

AstraZeneca is one company that has implemented a rigorous branding process for all its pipeline products. "Our objective is to get all the key branding elements in place before Phase III trials take place," explains Jon Parton, director of direct marketing at AstraZeneca. "Until Phase III sometimes there have been no publications outside of the company – so often branding is not important until this stage."

 
Companies should realize that Phase III trials are not just for scientists. Opinion leaders – doctors who will use the new drugs and recommend them to colleagues – are also involved. In fact, Phase III trials are key to any marketing strategy. Although doctors may focus on the clinical aspects of the trial, it makes sense to expose them to a brand and establish a strong and positive relationship.

"The marketing team is heavily involved in clinical trials," says Parton. "With a product's brand profile already established, if a particular claim is important, the team needs a study to prove it. We're not selling coffee – we can't say things that we can't support."

So how early can the marketers realistically get in on the act? Parton says that significant expense before Phase II trials does not make commercial sense. "We don't spend money before this because products die. We expect attrition. Branding begins after Phase II trials when the board makes the decision to take product development further and ramp up investment.

"We used to go straight to colors, fonts, etc, at this stage. Now we do something before all that called internal branding."

Internal branding remains within AstraZeneca, yet it defines all external communications. As Parton explains, "First, the brand promise is the summary of our target position. It is our expectation of where we think the product fits and what makes it special. It's a simple phrase that keeps people focused. Second, the brand personality defines the emotions and characteristics that we want associated with the product. Together these make up the brand essence: the how and the what of our brand."

It is this level of careful planning that the branding and marketing agencies advocate. And the experiences of AstraZeneca show why the agencies also push for an early start. To get from basic Phase II clinical data to a brand essence (or brand footprint or brand wheel depending on which agency you ask) can take as long as 18 months. Only then can companies begin to communicate externally. Pharmaceutical manufacturers are used to planning R&D years in advance. They must now do the same for their branding.    

[20-May-2002]

 
  
  

Edwin Colyer is a science and technology writer based in Manchester, UK.

     
 commenting closed Add Social Bookmark bookmark  print
 suggest topic  recommend ( 12 )  email

  brandchannel home archive   2013  |  2012  |  2011  |  2010  |  2009  |  2008  |  2007  |  2006  |  2005  |  2004  |  2003  | 2002  |  2001
 
 
Dec 30, 2002 Are Books Bound by Their Brand? -- Edwin Colyer
  Some authors have strong brands, but how many of us choose a book by its publisher?
   
 
Dec 16, 2002 Has Gen X Fallen Through the Cracks? -- Vivian Manning-Schaffel
  Generation Y appears preferable to Gen X for brand owners and advertisers pitching their wares. Should we mind the generation gap?
   
 
Dec 9, 2002 Can Small Businesses Sprout Big Brands? -- Edwin Colyer
  Small or large, every business has a brand, and the ability to use it to its advantage.
   
 
Dec 2, 2002 Anti-Globalists v. Big Brands: Who is Going to Win? -- Randall Frost
  Is there a win-win solution between the anti-globalists and big brands?
   
 
Nov 25, 2002 Milking the Organic Market -- Erin Speiser Ihde
  Organic brands are positioning themselves as an alternative for health-conscious, socially responsible consumers. The challenge? Milking a higher price.
   
 
Nov 18, 2002 Branding Drugs for a Market of One -- Edwin Colyer
  As pharmacogenomics surface on the horizon, how can pharmaceuticals market efficiently to tiny patient groups?
   
 
Nov 11, 2002 Can Japanese Brands Go Global? -- Randall Frost
  Why don't Japan's brands have a stronger presence outside of their local markets?
   
 
Nov 4, 2002 The Key to Branding (and Financial) Success -- Vincent Grimaldi de Puget
  How to make your brand rise above the background noise in spite of limited resources, and contribute to improving your company's bottom line.
   
 
Oct 28, 2002 Branding the Bush -- Ron Irwin
  Making a killing on eco-tourism.
   
 
Oct 21, 2002 Barbie Goes to Court -- Ed Meikle
  Barbie flexes her muscles in the wake of defamation.
   
 
Oct 14, 2002 Keep Your Brand Clean -- John Karolefski
  How to prove your innocence during a threat of guilty by association.
   
 
Oct 7, 2002 HELP WANTED: Top Talent Apply Within -- Dale Buss
  In lean times, companies depend even more on their most valuable brand champions: Employees.
   
 
Sep 30, 2002 Chefs Acquire a Taste for Branding -- Jocelyne Henri
  Creating a brand à la mode with France's pastry brands, Pierre Hermé, Dalloyau and Ladurée.
   
 
Sep 23, 2002 Putting Out the Fire: Managing Through Crisis -- David Liss
  Steering your brand through disaster.
   
 
Sep 16, 2002 Cutting Costs: Resource Management All in One Tool -- Fiona Harvey
  Is resource management resourceful thinking?
   
 
Sep 9, 2002 Fire Drill: Preparing for Crisis -- David Liss
  Are you ready to protect your brand when disaster strikes?
   
 
Sep 2, 2002 Can Dead Dot Coms Be Reincarnated? -- Brad Cook
  Is there value left in the dead brands of generically named dot coms such as pets, wine, and eToys.
   
 
Aug 26, 2002 Commodities: Branding the Basics -- Eric Mirabel
  How do we go about turning a commodity product or production capability into a new brand? We look at the Middle East, a transitioning market where manufacturers are branding commodities.
   
 
Aug 19, 2002 Brands in Toyland -- Ron Irwin
  Is branding in the toy world just child’s play? We look at how traditional brands like LEGO and Brio stand up to the dazzlingly high-tech competition.
   
 
Aug 12, 2002 Long Live the King -- John Karolefski
  Young and svelte, bloated and strung out, Elvis had universal appeal throughout his short lifespan. The king may be dead but apparently the brand lives on.
   
 
Aug 5, 2002 IBM Navigates the Biotech Maze -- Edwin Colyer
  IBM Global Services is expanding to a variety of areas like its recent acquisition of PwC Consulting. We look at how a brand like this penetrates the life sciences market.
   
 
Jul 29, 2002 Do Nonprofits Have Value? -- Robin Rusch
  As we unveil Interbrand's league tables of the world's most valuable brands for for-profit brands in 2002, we ask, Is there value in a nonprofit brand?
   
 
Jul 22, 2002 Trials and Tribulations of Global Naming -- Ed Meikle
  We look at recent trademarking issues from PricewaterhouseCoopers’ Monday to Philip Morris’s Altria and discuss the basic guidelines for domain name registration disputes.
   
 
Jul 15, 2002 Successful Start-ups Launch with a Brand -- David Liss
  Why do some start-up brands fail where others succeed? When should one begin to think about the brand in the entrepreneurial process?
   
 
Jul 8, 2002 Pushing Product: Is In-Store Promotion Effective? -- John Karolefski
  Is in-store marketing effective or just more clutter separating us from our favorite brand of ice cream?
   
 
Jul 1, 2002 Shopping Through a Recession: How Will Luxury Brands Survive? -- Dale Buss
  How are luxury brands faring in the aftermath of September 11 and the past year of recession?
   
 
Jun 24, 2002 Lawless Branding: Recent Developments in Trademark Law -- Ed Meikle
  This month’s trademark law developments: Sony loses Walkman to the masses in Austria and FIFA takes on ambush marketers in Latin America.
   
 
Jun 17, 2002 Prescribing a Global Identity -- Edwin Colyer
  The pharmaceutical industry has been wary of promoting big, international brands, but is it better to stay local or go global?
   
 
Jun 10, 2002 Positioning: The Missing Piece in the Tech Sector -- Rob Gelphman
  Brands in the tech sector need to work on their positioning.
   
 
Jun 3, 2002 The New CCO: Delivering Customer Care -- Dale Buss
  In a recession, suddenly everyone cares about attracting the customer. Enter the Chief Customer Officer.
   
 
May 27, 2002 Ambush Marketing Steals the Show -- Abram Sauer
  Competition is heating up as sponsoring brands of the World Cup and other global sporting events struggle with ambush marketing.
   
 
May 13, 2002 The Sport of Naming -- John Karolefski
  Naming rights for sports stadiums may be big business but are they sound business?
   
 
May 6, 2002 Private Labels: Does Branding Matter? -- Robin Rusch
  Can private labels be considered brands? What threat do they pose to brand owners?
   
 
Apr 29, 2002 Multimedia Makes the Grade -- Kim Barnet
  Can the education industry learn how to harness multimedia to create new tools and improve its overall brand image?
   
 
Apr 22, 2002 Franchising in China: A Dead Duck? -- Edward Young
  The rush to franchise in China may be faster than the drive-through at McDonald's, but the results are not always favorable to the brand.
   
 
Apr 15, 2002 Bottled Water Floods the Market -- John Karolefski
  Megabrands Groupe Danone and Nestlé lead the bottled water market. But as new markets rise, so do the stakes. Who will win the latest water war?
   
 
Apr 8, 2002 Can Branding Save the World? -- Ron Irwin
  Ben & Jerry’s, Avon and Patagonia all engage in cause-related or values-led marketing. Is it a justifiable endeavor or just a feel-good makeover?
   
 
Apr 1, 2002 Can Gap Mend Its Brand? -- Vivian Manning-Schaffel
  At one time, Gap had the retail clothing market sewn up. Now it struggles against sister brands Banana Republic and Old Navy.
   
 
Mar 25, 2002 Is China's Film Industry Overexposed? -- Edward Young
  As Kodak loses its agreement to manufacture film in China, are local brand Lucky and global giants Fuji, Konica, and Agfa-Gevaert ready to leap in?
   
 
Mar 18, 2002 Offensive But Effective? -- Edwin Colyer
  Campaigns for brands like Benetton and FCUK certainly get our attention, but what are they doing for the brand?
   
 
Mar 11, 2002 Mortal Brands: Continuing the Legacy -- John Karolefski
  What happens to a brand when its spokesperson literally dies? As Wendy’s re-evaluates its strategy, we look to other branded icons for some hints.
   
 
Mar 4, 2002 Apple Shines: Brandchannel's 2001 Readers' Choice Award Results -- Robin Rusch
  What do Apple, Nokia, Volkswagen, Google.com, Absolut and Starbucks have in common? Brandchannel's 2001 Readers' Choice survey results are here.
   
 
Feb 25, 2002 Has Your Brand Become Generic? -- Stephen Gardner
  What happens when your brand name is part of the public domain? We look at names that have gone generic.
   
 
Feb 18, 2002 Zero Percent Brand Management? -- Dale Buss
  Are American automakers trailing behind their overseas counterparts when it comes to managing their brands?
   
 
Feb 11, 2002 Conquering New Grounds -- John Karolefski
  Starbucks serves up a fresh brew around the world, but are non-Americans ready to wake up to this powerful brand?
   
 
Feb 4, 2002 MTV: 360 Degrees 24/7 -- Vivian Manning-Schaffel
  With a reputation like MTV, the pressure to score high in new media is huge. Is MTV able to give its audience what it wants… online?
   
 
Jan 28, 2002 Penetrating the Birth Control Market -- Katherine Daniel
  From legislation to disease, contraception manufacturers focus the brand on mundane subjects and leave out the best part: the sex!
   
 
Jan 21, 2002 Brand Mobility: Telecom Operators Turn to Handsets -- Edwin Colyer
  Will cellular service brands eclipse the big cellphone brands? Don't hang up on Nokia, Ericsson and Samsung just yet.
   
 
Jan 14, 2002 Is Your Brand Everlasting? -- John Karolefski
  We check in on 2001's fallen icons and ask why some stay strong and prosper, while others wither and die.
   
 
Jan 7, 2002 Will Online Rx Get Easier to Swallow? -- Edwin Colyer
  As pharmaceuticals struggle to get doctors to take their medicine, they ignore the valuable branding resources available on the web.