|
|
| |
|
| |
Now more than ever, pharmaceutical branding has become crucial to creating distinctions in the mind of the patient as well as the physician. This is especially relevant in the US, where drug makers engage in direct-to-consumer advertising – a concept that Europe is only beginning to consider.
"Branding should begin as soon as possible," says Peter Siegel, senior vice-president at Torre Lazur. "We like to get involved early so we are intimate with the product. While a product begins to develop a personality for the researcher, it is its eventual personality in the marketplace that will make it a brand. The sooner we're involved in the branding process the better, because it helps to create a bond with the brand and develop good relationships with the client as well. This journey from a product to a brand is a journey that clients and agencies should take together."
The goals of pharmaceutical branding are subtly different to those of consumer goods manufacturers. With the agreement of the government and healthcare payers, drug makers are free to charge high prices in order to recoup their substantial R&D costs. Branding is, therefore, rarely about adding a premium to a commodity product. Rather, it raises product awareness and boosts sales by projecting values and emotions to healthcare professionals and consumers alike.
The snag, however, is this: by the time a drug reaches the market it may only have a few years of patent protected life left. It can't afford to increase sales gradually through increasing awareness. It doesn't have time to build relationships. It has to launch with a bang.
In other words, all the elements of a pharmaceutical brand should be in place long before the product ever hits the drug store shelves. "Branding should begin as soon as possible," says Siegel. "We like to get involved early so we are intimate with the product. A brand happens anyway – it begins to develop a personality. The people who have created the molecule have a clear idea of what this is. The sooner we're involved the better because it helps to create a bond with the brand and develop good relationships too. When we go from a product to a brand, it's a journey that we take together."
Brand consultants and communications agencies naturally prefer a head start. The reality is often far from this ideal, however. Sometimes the bulk of branding work – from the establishment of brand values and product positioning to the choice of packaging colors – only takes place during Phase III trials.
Not that the drug makers are entirely to blame. Commercial factors can disrupt the best laid plans. The pharmaceutical market is extremely volatile; it only takes the launch of a competitor's product, a change in government policy, or a sudden breakthrough in the R&D labs to cause a drastic change in strategy. Products may have to race through development, with agencies brought in at the last minute.
Most people agree, however, that given the growing importance of branding, the process should generally begin earlier than it does at present.
AstraZeneca is one company that has implemented a rigorous branding process for all its pipeline products. "Our objective is to get all the key branding elements in place before Phase III trials take place," explains Jon Parton, director of direct marketing at AstraZeneca. "Until Phase III sometimes there have been no publications outside of the company – so often branding is not important until this stage."
|
| |
|
Companies should realize that Phase III trials are not just for scientists. Opinion leaders – doctors who will use the new drugs and recommend them to colleagues – are also involved. In fact, Phase III trials are key to any marketing strategy. Although doctors may focus on the clinical aspects of the trial, it makes sense to expose them to a brand and establish a strong and positive relationship.
"The marketing team is heavily involved in clinical trials," says Parton. "With a product's brand profile already established, if a particular claim is important, the team needs a study to prove it. We're not selling coffee – we can't say things that we can't support."
So how early can the marketers realistically get in on the act? Parton says that significant expense before Phase II trials does not make commercial sense. "We don't spend money before this because products die. We expect attrition. Branding begins after Phase II trials when the board makes the decision to take product development further and ramp up investment.
"We used to go straight to colors, fonts, etc, at this stage. Now we do something before all that called internal branding."
Internal branding remains within AstraZeneca, yet it defines all external communications. As Parton explains, "First, the brand promise is the summary of our target position. It is our expectation of where we think the product fits and what makes it special. It's a simple phrase that keeps people focused. Second, the brand personality defines the emotions and characteristics that we want associated with the product. Together these make up the brand essence: the how and the what of our brand."
It is this level of careful planning that the branding and marketing agencies advocate. And the experiences of AstraZeneca show why the agencies also push for an early start. To get from basic Phase II clinical data to a brand essence (or brand footprint or brand wheel depending on which agency you ask) can take as long as 18 months. Only then can companies begin to communicate externally. Pharmaceutical manufacturers are used to planning R&D years in advance. They must now do the same for their branding. [20-May-2002]
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
Edwin Colyer is a science and technology writer based in Manchester,
UK.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Aug 26, 2002
|
Commodities: Branding the Basics -- Eric Mirabel
|
|
|
How do we go about turning a commodity product or production capability into a new brand? We look at the Middle East, a transitioning market where manufacturers are branding commodities.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Aug 19, 2002
|
Brands in Toyland -- Ron Irwin
|
|
|
Is branding in the toy world just child’s play? We look at how traditional brands like LEGO and Brio stand up to the dazzlingly high-tech competition.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Aug 12, 2002
|
Long Live the King -- John Karolefski
|
|
|
Young and svelte, bloated and strung out, Elvis had universal appeal throughout his short lifespan. The king may be dead but apparently the brand lives on.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Aug 5, 2002
|
IBM Navigates the Biotech Maze -- Edwin Colyer
|
|
|
IBM Global Services is expanding to a variety of areas like its recent acquisition of PwC Consulting. We look at how a brand like this penetrates the life sciences market.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Jul 29, 2002
|
Do Nonprofits Have Value? -- Robin Rusch
|
|
|
As we unveil Interbrand's league tables of the world's most valuable brands for for-profit brands in 2002, we ask, Is there value in a nonprofit brand?
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Copyright © 2001-2013 brandchannel. All rights reserved.
|
|