|
|
| |
|
ING Group
void
September 9, 2002
For a bank that stresses the importance of brand image, ING’s corporate website still has a lot to demonstrate to avoid lagging behind the brand.
Brand positioning is all about the beliefs that the customer holds about a brand. That customer visiting ING Group’s website, www.ING.com, these days would be disappointed to see that the
|
|
|
|
|
|
bank seems entirely self-absorbed in the inauguration of its new headquarters (officially 16 September 2002).
Whether clicking on the rendering of the new building, or on the picture of a female customer – which together occupy the top tier of the homepage – the English-speaking visitor will land on the all-Dutch site of the ZuiderHof, the park outside Amsterdam where lies the new building (alongside rival ABN Amro).
|
|
|
| |
From here, there is no direct link back to ING’s corporate website, but we can nonetheless see the company (and construction workers) through a live webcam. Clicking on the ING Vastgoed button does not help, in spite of the common brand identity shared with ING Groep. Despite the appearance, “vastgoed” means “real estate.” However, the determined visitor will notice a lonely ING logo – without Vastgoed or any other extension – that will lead back to the ING Groep website. Of course, a few clicks on the browser’s back button would have achieved the same result. To its credit, this website is bilingual when it is not in Dutch, natuurlijk.
Besides the new head office building, the website’s most prominent features are, from top to bottom, a country selector, an advertising slogan (“ING leads the way in insurance, banking, and asset management”), a couple of navigation menus, press release headlines, and major links.
Overall, it looks rather cheap for a large established financial group that should try to connote trust and confidence in the minds of its worldwide customers and investors – trust and confidence being generally part of the brand DNA of corporations handling other people’s money.
Unfortunately, the site’s layout does not conform to the now accepted principles of usability, i.e., customer experience management. The frontpage, which gives the first impression, reminds one of last century portals. Moreover, products and services offerings are pretty much buried. The archives of webcast recordings are however a neat feature among an otherwise bureaucratic impression that this corporate website leaves.
|
|
|
|
*Due to the constantly changing environment of websites, some reviews may no longer reflect the current website for this brand.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Dec 9, 2002
|
Bajaj Auto Limited - Tanks
|
|
|
As Bajaj Auto Limited goes forward with its brand, its dot com division appears to be in reverse.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Nov 11, 2002
|
Grey Goose - Spirited
|
|
|
Grey Goose, the blind-taster's favorite vodka, celebrates a modern France online.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Nov 4, 2002
|
Tata - Wasteland
|
|
|
India's Tata Group demonstrates that placing a logo on a non-descript website is not online branding.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Oct 7, 2002
|
LIC - boredom insured
|
|
|
The Life Insurance Corp of India’s formidable and well-deserved reputation doesn’t appear to cover its website.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Sep 30, 2002
|
Benetton - divided
|
|
|
The only thing shocking about Benetton’s site is the lack of merchandizing.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Aug 26, 2002
|
Timex - flies
|
|
|
Timex winds up using hi-tech to appeal to the Indian market.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
Aug 12, 2002
|
CavinKare - blemish free
|
|
|
The Indian FMCG brand competes with brands like Hindustan Lever and P&G for the massive Indian market share.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Copyright © 2001-2013 brandchannel. All rights reserved.
|
|