Interbrand IQ: The Best Asian Brands Issue

rss

afternoon snack

Food: “Better-For-You” Means Better for Brands

Posted by Dale Buss on October 17, 2011 02:01 PM

Big food and beverage companies argue they are fighting federal regulators so stiffly about new front-of-package labeling standards for the nutritional characteristics of their products for an important reason: the government doesn’t want producers to be able to highlight the amounts of fiber, omega-3s and other positive nutrients in them – just to summarize how little sodium and other “bad things” they contain.

The debate could get sharper in the wake of the release of a new report that dimensionalizes the financial advantages brought to companies by developing and marketing “better-for-you” foods. Companies with a higher percentage of sales from BFY products had a 50 percent increase in operating profit (compared to 20 percent at companies with a below-average percentage of sales of those items), outperformed the S&P 500 by an average of 60 points (vs. 40 points) and generated higher shareholder returns than the other companies, according to a new study by the Hudson Institute and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.

Of course, new products drive sales, and much of the better-for-you fare is the newest part of lineups, especially those offered by mainstream companies that came later to the development of nutritionally positioned fare than the start-up companies that launched a revolution in the diet of many Americans.

While providing encouragement about an overall better-for-you direction, this picture doesn’t translate into clean agendas for individual companies.

PepsiCo, for example, has been struggling with the transition of its brands to better-for-you positioning even though CEO Indra Nooyi is clearly committed to making the company a paragon of the burgeoning BFY segment. Gatorade has re-energized growth with a new approach to its product line-up, for instance, and Trop50 has become a big new hit for Tropicana. But Frito-Lay has had uneven performance from its push into healthier snacks, and the company’s mishandling of its traditional Pepsi brand has undercut much of the progress its beverages division has made with better-for-you brands.

Comments

Florac United States says:

I am surprised and dismayed that there is push back on this from many CPG manufacturers. This can be a hug opportunity for many to not only revisit their brand's nutritional makeup but their brand message overall. The tide is moving towards more BFY products, and company's need to hop on the train or get lost in the dust. I would urge companies to again, turn this mandate into an opportunity, and this could be a big one!

October 18, 2011 11:50 AM #

Comments are closed

Brand Chatter on Twitter

elsewhere on brandchannel

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
brandcameo2013 Product Placement Awards
Which brand is most bullish on Hollywood?
Coca-ColaIt's the Journey That Matters:
Coca-Cola Opens Up With Story-Based Web Refresh
debateJoin the Debate
What makes a great brand?
BPBP
Branding Comeback Challenges
Denise Lee YohnLance Armstrong’s Brand
Denise Lee Yohn Weighs In
Digital Watch: WahlAT&T
Rethinking Possible With Transmedia Storytelling
paperGlobal Competitive [Ad]vantage
The latest from GeoEdge
Sheryl Connelly
Sheryl Connelly

Meet Ford's Resident Futurist
Marketing to the New MajorityBranding 123
A primer by Barry Silverstein